Searching for a supplier returned nothing even though the order existed
with that supplier set and "TRUCO" in the line description.
Root cause is not search coverage — it's a stale safety cap. The search
path fetched the active candidate set with a fixed `perPage: 500`, on the
comment's reasoning: "91 active orders out of 4,782, so the cap is
unreachable in practice." Measured on live PB 2026-10-14 the active set
is 610 orders. Because /api/v1/orders/list sorts `created` ASCENDING
(oldest first, so the buyer works the queue top-down), the slice kept
the 500 oldest and silently discarded the 110 newest.
Verified against live PB before the fix:
truco -> 0 matches
skirting -> 0 matches
tiaan -> 57 matches
After:
truco -> 1 match (ORD-26-10-13-SCALPERS, collection_pool)
skirting -> 1 match
tiaan -> 76 matches (19 were being dropped too)
It presented as "some searches work and some don't": only matches on
OLD orders survived, so it looked like a missing supplier field rather
than truncation, and the supplier lookup added in efb5a53 inherited the
bug rather than causing it.
Fix: `perPage: activeIds.length` so the candidate set is never sliced.
The set is already bounded by COMPLETED_WINDOW_DAYS plus the non-terminal
statuses, so it grows with daily throughput, not total history.
Regression test seeds 520 active orders with the needle on the newest,
so an ascending sort puts it past the old cap. Verified it FAILS against
the old code and passes against the new.
Dave
f44258667c