Asked what the 160 items under Disagreements were. Almost none were
disagreements, and a panel that cries wolf at 160 teaches people to scroll
past it - worse than having no panel at all.
147 of the 160 were the formula guard firing once per row. The consultant's
amount column is a formula on nearly every line, so 'I protected your model'
was being reported as 'a person must choose'. It is now its own quiet note and
cannot crowd out findings that genuinely need a decision.
12 more were unit formatting - 'PC Sum' vs 'PCSum' vs 'PC.Sum' is one unit
written three ways. Unit comparison now collapses case, spacing and dots, so
only genuinely different units are flagged.
160 -> 19, and all 19 are real. The ones worth a human's eye: seven quantity
disagreements (template 47.5 vs source 95.0) and eleven unit mismatches, five
of which are 'm' vs 'm3' - pricing a cubic metre as a linear metre is a real
error, and only comparing the two documents finds it.
Also: a conversion takes 30-90 seconds and a frozen page reads as a broken
one, so the run now narrates its stages in a st.status panel.